PARIS
— In a cultural twofer that makes it Frank Gehry week here, the Louis
Vuitton Foundation, a private cultural center and contemporary-art
museum designed by Mr. Gehry, had its official inaugural ceremony on
Monday, attended by the French president, François Hollande. At the same
time, the Pompidou Center across town is giving Mr. Gehry, based in Los
Angeles, a major career retrospective, his first in Europe.
The Pompidou exhibition, “Frank Gehry,”
establishes a narrative arc for a career that effectively started with
small-scale, experimental wood-frame studios and houses in Southern
California and culminates in the Vuitton Foundation in the Bois de
Boulogne, which some critics have called one of the most technologically
sophisticated, artistically motivated buildings of his oeuvre. A
126,000-square-foot, $135 million structure that formally opens to the
public next Monday, it promises to add a major contemporary monument to
Paris’s long list of historic architecture.
At
the end of the ceremony, President Hollande described the building as a
“cathedral of light” that was “a miracle of intelligence, creativity
and technology.”
Mr. Gehry’s moment in Paris comes after his Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial in Washington was approved last week,
following a bruising five-year process in which Mr. Gehry’s design went
through more than 15 committees and commissions and many adjustments.
In Paris, after settling concerns about building in a park, he needed
the approval of only one client, Bernard Arnault, chairman and chief
executive of the luxury goods conglomerate LVMH, whose foundation owns
the new building.
“The
guy knew what he wanted, and he wanted a building that would be
different than anything else anybody had ever seen,” said Mr. Gehry,
interviewed over coffee on Monday in his hotel off the Champs Élysées.
Mr. Arnault hired Mr. Gehry, he has said, after seeing his Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Spain,
a spectacle of fluid forms that reshaped that city’s derelict
waterfront while enclosing classical white galleries inside. At Vuitton,
Mr. Gehry builds on the Bilbao precedent, creating a more complex
structure clad in glass rather than titanium.
Visitors
encounter what looks like a Cubist sailboat, with glass sails and
spinnakers rising above the tree line and billowing simultaneously fore,
aft, port and starboard. The building appears to glide over a cascade
of water lapping down a stepped embankment below its cantilevered prow.
The two-story structure has 11 galleries, a voluminous auditorium and
multilevel roof terraces for events and art installations.
The
site is next to the Jardin d’Acclimatation, a 19th-century children’s
park and zoo at the north edge of the Romantically landscaped Bois de
Boulogne. The architect had to build within the square footage and
two-story volume of a bowling alley that previously stood here; anything
higher had to be glass. Mr. Arnault’s program for the Foundation, whose
stated mission is to stimulate artistic creation, called for a museum
with galleries for permanent and temporary exhibitions, and a concert
hall.
Mr.
Gehry said, “We talked to him about the site, and it was clear that it
had to be something that fits into a garden, something in the tradition
of a 19th-century glass pavilion or conservatory.”
Unlike his compatriot I. M. Pei, who placed the glass Pyramid at the Louvre
to acknowledge the long axis of the Champs Élysées, Mr. Gehry ignored
France’s geometric traditions. “The clouds of glass respond to nature’s
geometry, to the park’s English landscaping,” he said of the Bois de
Boulogne. “Nature’s apparent disorder has its own order.”
In trying to create a spirited adult version of the Jardin d’Acclimatation’s fantasy buildings,
Mr. Gehry said he was “very moved by the park, which reminded me of
Proust’s Paris.” He added: “I read him over and over again, and I
realized it was a pretty emotional site for everybody. It brought tears
to my eyes.”
He had two mandates: respecting the park and garden and satisfying the requirements for the galleries.
“Once
we had the big, basic premise that there was a solid piece for the
galleries, which we started to call the icebergs, and then the glass
sails for the garden, we started to work them independently,” Mr. Gehry
said. “Merging the two would not work, because you couldn’t have curvy
galleries, and you can’t hang paintings on glass.” The diaphanous sails,
supported on an acrobatic armature of wood and steel, project outside
the iceberg.
The glass structure takes its place in a long Parisian tradition dating from the 13th-century Gothic Sainte-Chapelle on the Île de la Cité, with its tall walls of stained glass, and the 19th-century Grand Palais,
an exhibition hall whose glass vaults echo the vast public spaces of
Rome. The Foundation’s fragmented, multidirectional forms recall the
Cubism of Braque and Picasso. The mission statement of the Foundation
acknowledges 20th-century Modern art movements as a basis of the
contemporary art it champions.
Visitors
enter a tall hall from which angled staircases and meandering paths
lead to the galleries and to a roofscape of outdoor terraces enclosed by
the glass sails. Between the iceberg and the sailboat, accordion spaces
expand and contract, alternately intimate and grand, in what Mr. Gehry
called “a chaotic dance.” The white galleries, some with tall ceilings
that act as chimneys of light, are “a refuge,” said Edwin Chan, a former
design partner in the Gehry firm, who worked with Mr. Gehry and the
main project architect, Laurence Tighe. One opens to the sky.
Frédéric
Migayrou, the deputy director of the Pompidou, organized the full
retrospective and a smaller boutique show of Mr. Gehry’s development
drawings that will be on view at the Foundation. “This building doesn’t
reveal itself at once, but over many encounters,” he said. “It’s a
provocation for the viewer; you have to be part of it, as with an
artwork where you make your own experience.”
Claude Parent,
France’s 91-year-old éminence grise in architecture whose work in the
1950s and ’60s anticipated deconstructivism, said that when he first saw
the Foundation building, “I was seized by an emotion so strong that it
seemed to come from something other than architecture.” He called Mr.
Gehry’s design “an act of unbridled imagination.”
Others
describe the building less favorably. The architecture critic of The
Guardian, Rohan Moore, known for his Spartan architectural attitudes,
wrote dismissively, “Everything that is good about the Fondation could
have been achieved, and better, without the sails.” Denis Lafay, writing
in the online financial newspaper La Tribune,
did not criticize the architecture but called the building the
ostentatious result of an oligarch’s commodifying of artistic creation
to burnish his own brand.
At
the Foundation, Mr. Migayrou’s immersive show, “Voyage of Creation,”
explains the building, with large-screen videos filmed from overhead
cranes and drones that flew over and through the building.
“I
wanted to give a dynamic view of the building, and the films put the
building into movement,” he said in an interview. The show includes many
conceptual and development models, along with the seminal sketches Mr.
Gehry drew on the long flight back to Los Angeles after he and Mr.
Arnault first met to discuss the project.
In
the Pompidou retrospective, Mr. Migayrou includes little-known urban
designs for housing projects and town plans, evidence of an
urban-planning expertise that he said had informed the organization of
all of Mr. Gehry’s architectural work. The exhibition also features a
wall of previously unexhibited photographs by Mr. Gehry, who gravitated
to raw moments in the cityscape, like cement plants, that his eye made
beautiful.
“He was photographing the city, the spaces between places,” Mr. Migayrou said.
He
also chose models and original drawings to show the evolution of Mr.
Gehry’s ideas leading up to the Vuitton Foundation. Other shows, Mr.
Migayrou said, “have portrayed Gehry’s buildings as an object, a shape.”
“I
tried to do the reverse,” he said, “going through all the works to
define the evolution of the language, the continuities, the idea of
dynamic movement, how he opens form so that they interact with the city
and provoke the movement of the body around the building.”
Correction: October 21, 2014
An earlier version of this article misidentified the island in the Seine where the Sainte-Chapelle is located. It is the Île de la Cité, not the Île St.-Louis.
An earlier version of this article misidentified the island in the Seine where the Sainte-Chapelle is located. It is the Île de la Cité, not the Île St.-Louis.
No comments:
Post a Comment