Translate

Thursday, October 30, 2014

Effects and aftermath of rape

The effects and aftermath of rape can include both physical trauma and psychological trauma. However, physical force is not necessarily used in rape, and physical injuries are not always a consequence. Deaths associated with rape are known to occur, though the prevalence of fatalities varies considerably across the world. For rape victims the more common consequences of sexual violence are those related to reproductive health, mental health, and social wellbeing.


Unbalanced scales.svg  Male-on-female rape Unbalanced scales.svg

In Physical Impact; Gynecological

  • Vaginal or anal bleeding or infection
  • Hypoactive sexual desire disorder
  • Vaginitis or vaginal inflammation
  • Dyspareunia — painful sexual intercourse
  • Vaginismus — a condition affecting a woman's ability to engage in any form of vaginal penetration
  • Chronic pelvic pain
  • Urinary tract infections
  • Pregnancy
  • HIV/AIDS

Rape trauma syndrome (RTS) is the psychological trauma experienced by a rape victim that includes disruptions to normal physical, emotional, cognitive, and interpersonal behavior. The theory was first described by psychiatrist Ann Wolbert Burgess and sociologist Lynda Lytle Holmstrom in 1974.
RTS is a cluster of psychological and physical signs, symptoms and reactions common to most rape victims immediately following and for months or years after a rape. While most research into RTS has focused on female victims, sexually abused males (whether by male or female perpetrators) also exhibit RTS symptoms.RTS paved the way for consideration of Complex Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, which can more accurately describe the consequences of serious, protracted trauma than Posttraumatic Stress Disorder alone. The symptoms of RTS and Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome overlap. As might be expected, a person who has been raped will generally experience high levels of distress immediately afterward. These feelings may subside over time for some people; however, individually each syndrome can have long devastating effects on rape victims and some victims will continue to experience some form of psychological distress for months or years. It has also been found that rape survivors are at high risk for developing substance use disorders, major depression, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and eating disorders


Unbalanced scales.svg  Common stages of RTS   Unbalanced scales.svg

Acute stage

The acute stage occurs in the days or weeks after a rape. Durations vary as to the amount of time the victim may remain in the acute stage. The immediate symptoms may last a few days to a few weeks and may overlap with the outward adjustment stage.
According to Scarse there is no "typical" response amongst rape victims. However, the U.S. Rape Abuse and Incest National Network (RAINN) asserts that, in most cases, a rape victim's acute stage can be classified as one of three responses: expressed ("He or she may appear agitated or hysterical, [and] may suffer from crying spells or anxiety attacks"); controlled ("the survivor appears to be without emotion and acts as if 'nothing happened' and 'everything is fine'"); or shock/disbelief ("the survivor reacts with a strong sense of disorientation. They may have difficulty concentrating, making decisions, or doing everyday tasks. They may also have poor recall of the assault"). Not all rape survivors show their emotions outwardly. Some may appear calm and unaffected by the assault.
Behaviors present in the acute stage can include:
  • Diminished alertness.
  • Numbness.
  • Dulled sensory, affective and memory functions.
  • Disorganized thought content.
  • Vomiting.
  • Nausea.
  • Paralyzing anxiety.
  • Pronounced internal tremor.
  • Obsession to wash or clean themselves.
  • Hysteria, confusion and crying.
  • Bewilderment.
  • Acute sensitivity to the reaction of other people.

Unbalanced scales.svg   The outward adjustment stage  Unbalanced scales.svg

Survivors in this stage seem to have resumed their normal lifestyle. However, they simultaneously suffer profound internal turmoil, which may manifest in a variety of ways as the survivor copes with the long-term trauma of a rape. In a 1976 paper, Burgess and Holmstrom note that all but 1 of their 92 subjects exhibited maladaptive coping mechanisms after a rape. The outward adjustment stage may last from several months to many years after a rape.
RAINN identifies five main coping strategies during the outward adjustment phase:
  • minimization (pretending 'everything is fine')
  • dramatization (cannot stop talking about the assault)
  • suppression (refuses to discuss the rape)
  • explanation (analyzes what happened)
  • flight (moves to a new home or city, alters appearance)
Other coping mechanisms that may appear during the outward adjustment phase include:
  • poor health in general.
  • continuing anxiety
  • sense of helplessness
  • hypervigilance
  • inability to maintain previously close relationships
  • experiencing a general response of nervousness known as the "startle response"
  • persistent fear and or depression at much higher rates than the general population
  • mood swings from relatively happy to depression or anger
  • extreme anger and hostility (more typical of male or masculine victims than female or feminine victims)
  • sleep disturbances such as vivid dreams and recurring nightmares
  • insomnia, wakefulness, night terrors
  • flashbacks
  • dissociation (feeling like one is not attached to one's body)
  • panic attacks
  • reliance on coping mechanisms, some of which may be beneficial (e.g., philosophy and family support), and others that may ultimately be counterproductive (e.g., self harm, drug, or alcohol abuse)

Lifestyle

Survivors in this stage can have their lifestyle affected in some of the following ways:
  • Their sense of personal security or safety is damaged.
  • They feel hesitant to enter new relationships.
  • Questioning their sexual identity or sexual orientation (more typical of men raped by other men).
  • Sexual relationships become disturbed. Many survivors have reported that they were unable to re-establish normal sexual relations and often shied away from sexual contact for some time after the rape. Some report inhibited sexual response and flashbacks to the rape during intercourse. Conversely, some rape survivors become hyper-sexual or promiscuous following sexual attacks, sometimes as a way to reassert a measure of control over their sexual relations.
Some rape survivors now see the world as a more threatening place to live after the rape so they will place restrictions on their lives so that normal activities will be interrupted. For example, they may discontinue previously active involvements in societies, groups or clubs, or a parent who was a survivor of rape may place restrictions on the freedom of their children.

Physiological responses

Whether or not they were injured during a sexual assault, rape survivors exhibit higher rates of poor health in the months and years after an assault, including acute somatoform disorders (physical symptoms with no identifiable cause).Physiological reactions such as tension headaches, fatigue, general feelings of soreness or localized pain in the chest, throat, arms or legs. Specific symptoms may occur that relate to the area of the body assaulted. Survivors of oral rape may have a variety of mouth and throat complaints, while survivors of vaginal or anal rape have physical reactions related to these areas.

Nature of the assault

  • The nature of the act, the relationship with the offender, the type and amount of force used, and the circumstances of the assault all influence the impact of an assault on the victim.
  • When the assault is committed by a stranger, fear seems to be the most difficult emotion to manage for many people.(Feelings of vulnerability arise).
  • More commonly, assaults are committed by someone the victim knows and trusts. May be heightened feelings of self-blame and guilt.

Underground stage

  • Victims attempt to return to their lives as if nothing happened.
  • May block thoughts of the assault from their minds and may not want to talk about the incident or any of the related issues. (They don't want to think about it).
  • Victims may have difficulty in concentrating and some depression.
  • Dissociation and trying to get back to their lives before the assault.
  • The underground stage may last for years and the victim seems as though that they are "over it", despite the fact the emotional issues are not resolved.

Reorganization stage

  • May return to emotional turmoil
  • The return of emotional pain can extremely frighten people in this stage.
  • Fears and phobias may develop. They may be related specifically to the assailant or the circumstances or the attack or they may be much more generalized.
  • Appetite disturbances such as nausea and vomiting. Rape survivors are also prone to developing anorexia nervosa and/or bulimia.
  • Nightmares, night terrors feel like they plague the victim.
  • Violent fantasies of revenge may also arise.

Phobias

A common psychological defense that is seen in rape survivors is the development of fears and phobias specific to the circumstances of the rape, for example:
  • A fear of being in crowds.
  • A fear of being left alone anywhere.
  • A fear of men or women. (androphobia or gynophobia)
  • A fear of going out at all, agoraphobia.
  • A fear of being touched, hapnophobia.
  • Specific fears related to certain characteristics of the assailant, e.g. side-burns, straight hair, the smell of alcohol or cigarettes, type of clothing or car.
  • Some survivors develop very suspicious, paranoid feelings about strangers.
  • Some feel a pervasive fear of most or all other people.

The renormalization stage

In this stage, the survivor begins to recognize his or her adjustment phase. Recognizing the impact of the rape for survivors who were in denial, and recognizing the secondary damage of any counterproductive coping tactics (e.g., recognizing that one's drug abuse began to help cope with the aftermath of a rape) is particularly important. Male victims typically do not seek psychotherapy for a long time after the sexual assault—according to Lacey and Roberts, less than half of male victims sought therapy within six months and the average interval between assault and therapy was 2.5 years; King and Woollett's study of over 100 male rape victims found that the mean interval between assault and therapy was 16.4 years.
During renormalization, survivors integrate the sexual assault into their lives so that the rape is no longer the central focus of their lives; negative feelings such as guilt and shame become resolved, and survivors no longer blame themselves for the attack.

Legal issues

Prosecutors sometimes use RTS evidence to disabuse jurors of prejudicial misconceptions arising from a victim's ostensibly unusual post-rape behavior. The RTS testimony helps educate the jury about the psychological consequences surrounding rape and functions to dispel rape myths by explaining counterintuitive post-rape behavior.
Especially in cases in which prosecutors have introduced RTS testimony, defendants have also sometimes proffered RTS evidence, a practice that has been criticized as undermining core values embodied in rape shield laws, since it can involve subjecting victims to compelled psychological evaluations and searching cross-examination regarding past sexual history. Since social scientists have difficulty distinguishing symptoms attributable to rape-related PTSD from those induced by previous traumatic events, rape defendants sometimes argue that an alternative traumatic event, such as a previous rape, could be the source of the victim's symptoms.

Criticism

A criticism of rape trauma syndrome as currently conceptualized is that it delegitimizes women's reactions to rape by describing their coping mechanisms, including their rational attempts to struggle through, survive the pain of sexual assault, and to adapt to a violent world, as symptoms of disorder. Women who installed locks and purchased security devices, took self-defense classes, carried mace, changed residence, and expressed anger at the criminal justice system, for example, were characterized as exhibiting pathological symptoms and "adjustment difficulties". According to this criticism, RTS removes women's pain and anger from their social and political context, attributing a woman's anguish, humiliation, anger, and despair after being raped to a disorder caused by the actions of the rapist, rather than to, say, insensitive treatment by the police, examining physicians, and the judicial system; or to family reactions permeated with rape mythology.
Another criticism is that the literature on RTS constructs rape survivors as passive, disordered victims, even though much of the behavior that serves as the basis for RTS could be considered the product of strength. Words like "fear" are replaced with words like "phobia," with its connotations of irrationality.
Criticisms of the scientific validity of the RTS construct are that it is vague in important details; it is unclear what its boundary conditions are; it uses unclear terms that do not have a basis in psychological science; it fails to specify key quantitative relationships; it has not undergone subsequent scientific evaluation since the 1974 Burgess and Holstrom study; there are theoeretical allegiance effects; it has not achieved a consensus in the field; it is not falsifiable; it ignores possible mediators; it is not culturally sensitive; and it is not suitable for being used to infer that rape has or has not occurred. PTSD has been described as a superior model since unlike RTS, empirical examination of the PTSD model has been extensive, both conceptually and empirically.



Self-blame is among the most common of both short- and long-term effects and functions as an avoidance coping skill that inhibits the healing process and can often be remedied by a cognitive therapy technique known as cognitive restructuring.
There are two main types of self-blame: behavioral self-blame (undeserved blame based on actions) and characterological self-blame (undeserved blame based on character). Victims who experience behavioral self-blame feel that they should have done something differently, and therefore feel at fault. Victims who experience characterological self-blame feel there is something inherently wrong with them which has caused them to deserve to be assaulted.
Unfortunately, the victim's support system is not always the best place for the victim to seek consolation. Sometimes in an effort to shield oneself from believing such a thing could happen to their loved one, a supporter will make excuses for why the event occurred. Some support will decide that the victim put themselves in a bad situation, even though they didn't deserve to be raped- which does not help the victim in his or her recovery. The victim will often already internally blame themselves, especially because the violation of boundaries, broken trust, and the feeling of personal danger occurs with rape. If the support system they look to for support is a partner or spouse, some may be unwilling to accept reality and leave or blame the victim. In that situation, it is even more important to be able to find support in others.
Most victims cannot be reassured enough that what happened to them is "not their fault." This helps them fight through shame and feel safe, secure, and grieve in a healthy way. In most cases, a length of time, and often therapy, are necessary to allow the victim and people close to the victim to process and heal.
A leading researcher on the psychological causes and effects of shame, June Tangney, lists five ways shame can be destructive:[17]
  • lack of motivation to seek care;
  • lack of empathy;
  • cutting themselves off from other people;
  • anger;
  • aggression.
Tangney says shame has a special link to anger. "In day-to-day life, when people are shamed and angry they tend to be motivated to get back at a person and get revenge."
In addition, shame is connected to psychological problems – such as eating disorders, substance abuse, anxiety, depression, and other mental disorders as well as problematic moral behavior. In one study over several years, shame-prone children were also prone to substance abuse, earlier sexual activity, less safe sexual activity, and involvement with the criminal justice system.
Behavioral self-blame is associated with feelings of guilt within the victim. While the belief that one had control during the assault (past control) is associated with greater psychological distress, the belief that one has more control during the recovery process (present control) is associated with less distress, less withdrawal, and more cognitive reprocessing.
Counseling responses found helpful in reducing self-blame are supportive responses, psychoeducational responses (learning about rape trauma syndrome) and those responses addressing the issue of blame.[ A helpful type of therapy for self-blame is cognitive restructuring or cognitive-behavioral therapy. Cognitive reprocessing is the process of taking the facts and forming a logical conclusion from them that is less influenced by shame or guilt.

Suicide

Childhood and adulthood victims of rape are more likely to attempt or commit suicide. The association remains, even after controlling for sex, age, education, symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder and the presence of psychiatric disorders.The experience of being raped can lead to suicidal behavior as early as adolescence. In Ethiopia, 6% of raped schoolgirls reported having attempted suicide. They also feel embarrassed to talk about what had happened to them. A study of adolescents in Brazil found prior sexual abuse to be a leading factor predicting several health risk behaviours, including suicidal thoughts and attempts.

Sociological impact

Secondary victimization

Rape is especially stigmatizing in cultures with strong customs and taboos regarding sex and sexuality. For example, a rape victim (especially one who was previously a virgin) may be viewed by society as being "damaged." Victims in these cultures may suffer isolation, be disowned by friends and family, be prohibited from marrying, be divorced if already married, or even killed. This phenomenon is known as secondary victimization.
Secondary victimization is the re-traumatization of the sexual assault, abuse, or rape victim through the responses of individuals and institutions. Types of secondary victimization include victim blaming and inappropriate post-assault behavior or language by medical personnel or other organizations with which the victim has contact. Secondary victimization is especially common in cases of drug-facilitated, acquaintance, and statutory rape.

Victim blaming


The term victim blaming refers to holding the victim of a crime to be responsible for that crime, either in whole or in part. In the context of rape, it refers to the attitude that certain victim behaviors (such as flirting or wearing sexually provocative clothing) may have encouraged the assault. Rapists are known to use victim blaming as their primary psychological disconnect from their crime(s) and in some cases it has led to their inevitable conviction.

It has been proposed that one cause of victim blaming is the just world hypothesis. People who believe that the world is intrinsically fair may find it difficult or impossible to accept a situation in which a person is badly hurt for no reason. This leads to a sense that victims must have done something to deserve their fate. Another theory entails the psychological need to protect one's own sense of invulnerability, which can inspire people to believe that rape only happens to those who provoke the assault. Believers use this as a way to feel safer: If one avoids the behaviours of the past victims, one will be less vulnerable. A global survey of attitudes toward sexual violence by the Global Forum for Health Research shows that victim-blaming concepts are at least partially accepted in many countries.
It has also been proposed by Dr Roxanne Agnew- Davies, a clinical psychologist and an expert on the effects of sexual violence, that victim-blaming correlates with fear. "It is not surprising when so many rape victims blame themselves. Female jurors can look at the woman in the witness stand and decide she has done something 'wrong' such as flirting or having a drink with the defendant. She can therefore reassure herself that rape won't happen to her as long as she does nothing similar."
Many of the countries in which victim blaming is more common are those in which there is a significant social divide between the freedoms and status afforded to men and women.

Adult-on-child rape


Rape and other forms of sexual assault on a child can result in both short-term and long-term harm, including psychopathology in later life. Psychological, emotional, physical, and social effects include depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, eating disorders, poor self-esteem, dissociative and anxiety disorders; general psychological distress and disorders such as somatization, neurosis, chronic pain, sexualized behavior, school/learning problems; and behavior problems including substance abuse, destructive behavior, criminality in adulthood and suicide.
The risk of lasting psychological harm is greater if the perpetrator of the sexual assault on the child is a relative (i.e., incest), or if threats or force are used. Incestual rape has been shown to be one of the most extreme forms of childhood trauma, a trauma that often does serious and long-term psychological damage, especially in the case of parental incest.

Unbalanced scales.svg   Psychological effects  Unbalanced scales.svg

Child sexual abuse can result in both short-term and long-term harm, including psychopathology in later life. Indicators and effects include depression,anxiety, eating disorders, poor self-esteem,somatization, sleep disturbances,and dissociative and anxiety disorders including post-traumatic stress disorder. While children may exhibit regressive behaviours such as thumb sucking or bedwetting, the strongest indicator of sexual abuse is sexual acting out and inappropriate sexual knowledge and interest. Victims may withdraw from school and social activities and exhibit various learning and behavioural problems including cruelty to animals, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), conduct disorder, and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). Teenage pregnancy and risky sexual behaviors may appear in adolescence. Child sexual abuse victims report almost four times as many incidences of self-inflicted harm.

A study funded by the USA National Institute of Drug Abuse found that "Among more than 1,400 adult females, childhood sexual abuse was associated with increased likelihood of drug dependence, alcohol dependence, and psychiatric disorders. The associations are expressed as odds ratios: for example, women who experienced nongenital sexual abuse in childhood were 2.83 times more likely to suffer drug dependence as adults than were women who were not abused."
A well-documented, long-term negative effect is the repeated or additional victimization in adolescence and adulthood.A causal relationship has been found between childhood sexual abuse and various adult psychopathologies, including crime and suicide, in addition to alcoholism and drug abuse. Males who were sexually abused as children more frequently appear in the criminal justice system than in a clinical mental health setting. A study comparing middle-aged women who were abused as children with non-abused counterparts found significantly higher health care costs for the former.Intergenerational effects have been noted, with the children of victims of child sexual abuse exhibiting more conduct problems, peer problems, and emotional problems than their peers.
A specific characteristic pattern of symptoms has not been identified,and there are several hypotheses about the causality of these associations.
Studies have found that 51% to 79% of sexually abused children exhibit psychological symptoms.The risk of harm is greater if the abuser is a relative, if the abuse involves intercourse or attempted intercourse, or if threats or force are used. The level of harm may also be affected by various factors such as penetration, duration and frequency of abuse, and use of force.The social stigma of child sexual abuse may compound the psychological harm to children, and adverse outcomes are less likely for abused children who have supportive family environments.

Dissociation and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)


Child abuse, including sexual abuse, especially chronic abuse starting at early ages, has been found to be related to the development of high levels of dissociative symptoms, which includes amnesia for abuse memories.When severe sexual abuse (penetration, several perpetrators, lasting more than one year) had occurred, dissociative symptoms were even more prominent.
Besides dissociative identity disorder (DID) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), child sexual abuse survivors may present borderline personality disorder (BPD) and eating disorders such as bulimia nervosa.

Research factors

Because child sexual abuse often occurs alongside other possibly confounding variables, such as poor family environment and physical abuse, some scholars argue it is important to control for those variables in studies which measure the effects of sexual abuse. In a 1998 review of related literature, Martin and Fleming state "The hypothesis advanced in this paper is that, in most cases, the fundamental damage inflicted by child sexual abuse is due to the child's developing capacities for trust, intimacy, agency and sexuality, and that many of the mental health problems of adult life associated with histories of child sexual abuse are second-order effects." Other studies have found an independent association of child sexual abuse with adverse psychological outcomes.
Kendler et al. (2000) found that most of the relationship between severe forms of child sexual abuse and adult psychopathology in their sample could not be explained by family discord, because the effect size of this association decreased only slightly after they controlled for possible confounding variables. Their examination of a small sample of CSA-discordant twins also supported a causal link between child sexual abuse and adult psychopathology; the CSA-exposed subjects had a consistently higher risk for psychopathologic disorders than their CSA non-exposed twins.
A 1998 meta-analysis by Bruce Rind et al. generated controversy by suggesting that child sexual abuse does not always cause pervasive harm, that some college students reported such encounters as positive experiences and that the extent of psychological damage depends on whether or not the child described the encounter as "consensual."The study was criticized for flawed methodology and conclusions.The US Congress condemned the study for its conclusions and for providing material used by pedophile organizations to justify their activities.

Psychological & Sociology : Just-world hypothesis

The just-world hypothesis or just-world fallacy is the cognitive bias (or assumption) that a person's actions always bring morally fair and fitting consequences to that person, so that all noble actions are eventually rewarded and all evil actions are eventually punished. In other words, the just-world hypothesis is the tendency to attribute consequences to—or expect consequences as the result of—a universal force that restores moral balance. The fallacy is that this implies (often unintentionally) the existence of cosmic justice, destiny, divine providence, desert, stability, or order, and may also serve to rationalize people's misfortune on the grounds that they deserve it.
The hypothesis popularly appears in the English language in various figures of speech that imply guaranteed negative reprisal, such as: "You got what was coming to you", "What goes around comes around", and "You reap what you sow". This hypothesis has been widely studied by social psychologists since Melvin J. Lerner conducted seminal work on the belief in a just world in the early 1960s. Research has continued since then, examining the predictive capacity of the hypothesis in various situations and across cultures, and clarifying and expanding the theoretical understandings of just-world beliefs.

 Unbalanced scales.svg  Theory

  

To explain these studies' findings, Lerner theorized that there was a prevalent belief in a just world. A just world is one in which actions and conditions have predictable, appropriate consequences. These actions and conditions are typically individuals' behaviors or attributes. The specific conditions that correspond to certain consequences are socially determined by a society's norms and ideologies. Lerner presents the belief in a just world as functional: it maintains the idea that one can influence the world in a predictable way. Belief in a just world functions as a sort of "contract" with the world regarding the consequences of behavior. This allows people to plan for the future and engage in effective, goal-driven behavior. Lerner summarized his findings and his theoretical work in his 1980 monograph The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion.

Lerner hypothesized that the belief in a just world is crucially important for people to maintain for their own well-being. But people are confronted daily with evidence that the world is not just: people suffer without apparent cause. Lerner explained that people use strategies to eliminate threats to their belief in a just world. These strategies can be rational or irrational. Rational strategies include accepting the reality of injustice, trying to prevent injustice or provide restitution, and accepting one's own limitations. Non-rational strategies include denial, withdrawal, and reinterpretation of the event.
There are a few modes of reinterpretation that could make an event fit the belief in a just world. One can reinterpret the outcome, the cause, and/or the character of the victim. In the case of observing the injustice of the suffering of innocent people, one major way to rearrange the cognition of an event is to interpret the victim of suffering as deserving. Specifically, observers can blame victims for their suffering on the basis of their behaviors and/or their characteristics. Much psychological research on the belief in a just world has focused on these negative social phenomena of victim blaming and victim derogation in different contexts.
An additional effect of this thinking is that individuals experience less personal vulnerability because they do not believe they have done anything to deserve or cause negative outcomes. This is related to the self-serving bias observed by social psychologists.
Many researchers have interpreted just-world beliefs as an example of causal attribution. In victim blaming, the causes of victimization are attributed to an individual rather than to a situation. Thus, the consequences of belief in a just world may be related to or explained in terms of particular patterns of causal attribution.


Unbalanced scales.svgAlternatives

Veridical judgment


Others have suggested alternative explanations for the derogation of victims. One suggestion is that derogation effects are based on accurate judgments of a victim's character. In particular, in relation to Lerner's first studies, some have hypothesized that it would be logical for observers to derogate an individual who would allow himself to be shocked without reason. A subsequent study by Lerner challenged this alternative hypothesis by showing that individuals are only derogated when they actually suffer; individuals who agreed to undergo suffering but did not were viewed positively.

Guilt reduction

Another alternative explanation offered for the derogation of victims early in the development of the just-world hypothesis was that observers derogate victims to reduce their own feelings of guilt. Observers may feel responsible, or guilty, for a victim's suffering if they themselves are involved in the situation or experiment. In order to reduce the guilt, they may devalue the victim.Lerner and colleagues claim that there has not been adequate evidence to support this interpretation. They conducted one study that found derogation of victims occurred even by observers who were not implicated in the process of the experiment and thus had no reason to feel guilty.

Additional evidence

After Lerner's first studies, other researchers replicated these findings in other settings in which individuals are victimized. This work, which began in the 1970s and continues today, has investigated how observers react to victims of random calamities like traffic accidents, as well as rape and domestic violence, illnesses, and poverty. Generally, researchers have found that observers of the suffering of innocent victims tend to both derogate and blame victims for their suffering. Observers thus maintain their belief in a just world by changing their cognitions about the victims' character.
In the early 1970s, social psychologists Zick Rubin and Letitia Anne Peplau developed a measure of belief in a just world. This measure and its revised form published in 1975 allowed for the study of individual differences in just-world beliefs..Much of the subsequent research on the just-world hypothesis used these measurement scales.

Violence

Researchers have looked at how observers react to victims of rape and other violence. In a formative experiment on rape and belief in a just world by Linda Carli and colleagues, researchers gave two groups of subjects a narrative about interactions between a man and a woman. The description of the interaction was the same until the end; one group received a narrative that had a neutral ending and the other group received a narrative that ended with the man raping the woman. Subjects judged the rape ending as inevitable and blamed the woman in the narrative for the rape on the basis of her behavior, but not her characteristics. These findings have been replicated repeatedly, including using a rape ending and a 'happy ending' (a marriage proposal).
Other researchers have found a similar phenomenon for judgments of battered partners. One study found that observers' labels of blame of female victims of relationship violence increase with the intimacy of the relationship. Observers blamed the perpetrator only in the most significant case of violence, in which a male struck an acquaintance.

Bullying

Researchers have employed the just-world hypothesis to understand bullying. Given other research on beliefs in a just world, it would be expected that observers would derogate and blame bullying victims, but the opposite has been found: individuals high in just-world belief have stronger anti-bullying attitudes.Other researchers have found that strong belief in a just world is associated with lower levels of bullying behavior.[This finding is in keeping with Lerner's understanding of belief in a just world as functioning as a "contract" that governs behavior. There is additional evidence that belief in a just world is protective of the well-being of children and adolescents in the school environment,as has been shown for the general population.

Illness

Other researchers have found that observers judge sick people as responsible for their illnesses. One experiment showed that persons suffering from a variety of illnesses were derogated on a measure of attractiveness more than healthy individuals were. In comparison to healthy people, victim derogation was found for persons presenting with indigestion, pneumonia, and stomach cancer. Moreover, derogation was found to be higher for those suffering from severer illnesses, except for those presenting with cancer. Stronger belief in a just world has also been found to correlate with greater derogation of AIDS victims.[25]

Poverty

More recently, researchers have explored how people react to poverty through the lens of the just-world hypothesis. Strong belief in a just world is associated with blaming the poor, with weak belief in a just world associated with identifying external causes of poverty including world economic systems, war, and exploitation.

The self as victim

Some research on belief in a just world has examined how people react when they themselves are victimized. An early paper by Dr. Ronnie Janoff-Bulman found that rape victims often blame their own behavior, but not their own characteristics, for their victimization.It was hypothesized that this may be because blaming one's own behavior makes an event more controllable.
These studies on victims of violence, illness, and poverty and others like them have provided consistent support for the link between observers' just-world beliefs and their tendency to blame victims for their suffering.[ As a result, the just-world hypothesis has become widely accepted.

Unbalanced scales.svgTheoretical refinement

Subsequent work on measuring belief in a just world has focused on identifying multiple dimensions of the belief. This work has resulted in the development of new measures of just-world belief and additional research. Hypothesized dimensions of just-world beliefs include belief in an unjust world, beliefs in immanent justice and ultimate justice, hope for justice, and belief in one's ability to reduce injustice. Other work has focused on looking at the different domains in which the belief may function; individuals may have different just-world beliefs for the personal domain, the sociopolitical domain, the social domain, etc. An especially fruitful distinction is between the belief in a just world for the self (personal) and the belief in a just world for others (general). These distinct beliefs are differentially associated with health.

Correlates

Researchers have used measures of belief in a just world to look at correlates of high and low levels of belief in a just world.
Limited studies have examined ideological correlates of the belief in a just world. These studies have found sociopolitical correlates of just-world beliefs, including right-wing authoritarianism and the protestant work ethic. Studies have also found belief in a just world to be correlated with aspects of religiousness.
Studies of demographic differences, including gender and racial differences, have not shown systematic differences, but do suggest racial differences, with Black and African Americans having the lowest levels of belief in a just world.
The development of measures of just-world beliefs has also allowed researchers to assess cross-cultural differences in just-world beliefs. Much research conducted shows that beliefs in a just world are evident cross-culturally. One study tested beliefs in a just world of students in 12 countries. This study found that in countries where the majority of inhabitants are powerless, belief in a just world tends to be weaker than in other countries. This supports the theory of the just-world hypothesis because the powerless have had more personal and societal experiences that provided evidence that the world is not just and predictable.

Current researchUnbalanced scales.svg

Positive mental health effects

Though much of the initial work on belief in a just world focused on its negative social effects, other research suggests that belief in a just world is good, and even necessary, for mental health. Belief in a just world is associated with greater life satisfaction and well-being and less depressive affect. Researchers are actively exploring reasons that belief in a just world might have this relationship to mental health; it has been suggested that such beliefs could be a personal resource or coping strategy that buffers stress associated with daily life and with traumatic events.This hypothesis suggests that belief in a just world can be understood as a positive illusion.
Correlational studies also show that beliefs in a just world are correlated with internal locus of control.Strong belief in a just world is associated with greater acceptance of and less dissatisfaction with negative events in one's life. This may be one way in which belief in a just world affects mental health. Others have suggested that this relationship holds only for beliefs in a just world for oneself. Beliefs in a just world for others are related instead to the negative social phenomena of victim blaming and victim derogation observed in other studies.

International research

More than 40 years after Lerner's seminal work on belief in a just world, researchers continue to study the phenomenon. Work continues primarily in the United States, Europe, Australia, and Asia. Researchers in Germany have contributed disproportionately to recent research. Their work resulted in a volume edited by Lerner and a German researcher titled Responses to Victimizations and Belief in a Just World.


Asteroid mining equipment, satellites and ISS supplies

  • John Barnes of the University of Missouri has sensationally claimed that drawings of what were thought to be hunting scenes may be constellations
  • His findings are based on the analysis of an ancient Greek vessel
  • The two-handled cup called a skyphos was found north of Thebes, Greece
  • It is thought to date back to around 625 BC 
  • On the side it has drawings of animals that correspond to constellations
  • These include a bull (Taurus), a lion (Leo) and a dolphin (Delphinus)
  • Mr Barnes says it is unusual for these animals to be drawn together
  • And he says instead they seem to be grouped into seasons
  • This suggests the cup is one of the earliest replicas of Greek astronomy 

    Companies reveal losses after Nasa's unmanned vehicle and its $200 million cargo blew up just six seconds after taking off

  • Equipment that would have helped find asteroids to mine has been lost on yesterday's rocket launch
  • Orbital Sciences Antares rocket exploded six seconds are lift off yesterday evening at 6.22pm EDT
  • The launch was taking place from their site in Wallops Island, Virginia and there were no casualties
  • There were also 26 mini satellites on board that would have performed experiments in Earth orbit
  • Officials also said there was 'classified' material on board that had to be recovered immediately after the failure  
  • And there was various food and supplies on board for astronauts on the ISS
  • However the astronauts will not be devoid of supplies - a Russian rocket successfully took off just hours later
  • It's thought the error may have been caused by antiquated Soviet engines used on the Antares rocket
  • One of these rockets failed in a test firing back in May of this year 
  • Orbital Sciences may not be able to launch again for a year owing to the damage 
  • Team said there appeared to be 'no issues' before launch and 'no early indications' of what happened
  • Self destruct command was sent to rocket before it hit the ground but it's unclear how much of the explosion was caused by this and how much was the malfunction
  • Public urged to stay away from debris with officials warning it may be 'hazardous' - and there is also classified material
  • Rocket launch is part of $1.9bn private contract to launch cargo to space station
  • Flight would have been visible from Massachusetts all the way to South Carolina 
  • An attempt to launch the day before was abandoned with seconds to go after a sailboat entered a 'hazard zone' area

A rocket that exploded yesterday evening at 6:22pm EDT was carrying equipment that would have helped hunt for asteroids to mine and also a number of Earth-observation satellites, it has been confirmed.
The Nasa-funded rocket exploded on its way to the International Space Station just six seconds after lift-off from the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport on Wallops Island in Virginia.
And today organisations were counting the cost as more than £125 million ($200 million) worth of equipment went up in smoke in the explosion. 

The launch appeared to be going perfectly, and the Antares rocket bound for the ISS left the launchpad - but then explodedThe launch appeared to be going perfectly, and the Antares rocket bound for the ISS left the launchpad - but then exploded

WHAT WAS ON THE ROCKET? 

The Antares rocket was carrying the Cygnus spacecraft, which is an unmanned resupply vessel for the ISS.
On board this spacecraft was a variety of equipment from private companies to perform experiments in Earth orbit,  
It had on board the Arkyd 3 satellite, which would have tested technology from Planetary Resources to search for asteroids to mine.
It also had 26 Doves, which are miniature cubesats. These small satellites designed by Planet Labs were intended to conduct experiments in Earth orbit.
There were also 18 student experiments investigate crystal formation, seed germination, plant growth, and other processes in microgravity as part of the Student Spaceflight Experiments Program.

One of the payloads was the Arkyd 3 satellite built by Planetary Resources, a company that intends to begin mining asteroids in Earth orbit in the coming decades.
This satellite, costing hundreds of thousands of dollars, was to be a demonstrator of the technology that will ultimately be used to find asteroids that are suitable to mine.
But its loss will be a major setback in Planetary Resources’ attempts to begin the age of asteroid mining. 
They were publicly upbeat on their Twitter page however, tweeting: ‘Live to fly another day. Onward! #Antares.’
And their chief Chris Lewicki later tweeted: ‘Cheer up everybody - A3 was just a robot! We are making more.’
Arkyd 3 would have been taken to the ISS and then released from an airlock on the Japanese Kibo module.
It would have tested the control system and also the propulsion system for the probes that will ultimately be used to find asteroids in the future. 
Another payload lost was a group of 26 small cubesat satellites known as Doves, made by Planet Labs.
These would have been used to observe Earth, taking pictures of the ground, as has been performed by similar Dove satellites. 
However, the company too was upbeat, highlighting that they spread their spacecraft across many different launches to mitigate the effects of a disaster such as this.

The beauty of this approach is the very fact that this event is not catastrophic to our company,’ the company writes on their website.
‘Our eggs were not all in one basket.’ 
In videos, the rocket is seen leaning to the right on purpose after launch to avoid pad equipment.
It has been reported that officials did send a self-destruct signal to the rocket, which is standard procedure in such an abort, but it’s unknown how much of the explosion was due to the initial malfunction or the self-destruct.
The explosion will also have caused a lot of damage to ground systems and the launchpad used by Orbital to reach space.
This is the only launchpad that can be used by Orbital’s Antares rocket, meaning it could take more than a year until they can begin flying again.
There has been speculation that the cause of the explosion may have been an engine called the AJ-26 used by Orbital.
This is an old Russian engine once used on their ill-fated lunar rocket, the N1, that had been upgraded for use on the Antares rocket. Back in May of this year one of the engines exploded in a test firing.
Officials finished their first assessment of the island on Wednesday and found that the damage was mostly centered on the third of the Wallops Island in the immediate vicinity of the launch pad. However, it will take months to complete the investigation into what went wrong and the consequences of the explosion
'I want to praise the launch team, range safety, all of our emergency responders and those who provided mutual aid and support on a highly-professional response that ensured the safety of our most important resource -- our people,' said Bill Wrobel, Wallops director. 
'In the coming days and weeks ahead, we'll continue to assess the damage on the island and begin the process of moving forward to restore our space launch capabilities. There's no doubt in my mind that we will rebound stronger than ever.' 
Investigations found that many of the buildings surrounding the launchpad had broken windows  and imploded doors. However, sampels showed there were no hazardous substances detected in the air or in the waters surrounding the island. Officials will continue to monitor the situation, but the north side of the island has been reopened for the U.S. Navy to return to work.  

Fears that the latest explosion would leave the astronauts on the ISS devoid of essential supplies were unfounded, though, as a Russian rocket launched perfectly just hours later from Kazakhstan.
But the explosion of the Antares rocket in Virginia is a major setback for Orbital Sciences, which is one of several companies competing for launch contracts from Nasa and elsewhere.
'A mishap has occurred. We have lost the vehicle,' controllers said seconds after blast off.
The rocket had been delayed from launching for a day after a sailboat strayed into the hazard zone on Monday, causing that launch to be scrubbed.
And conditions seemed to be perfect for the latest launch attempt, until seconds after it left the pad when it exploded.
'This is a tough evening,' said Frank Culberston of Orbital Sciences, which is working with the FAA to investigate the explosion.
'We want to express our disappointment, especially to the researchers who had science on board.’
Meanwhile William Gerstenmaier, Associate Administrator of Nasa’s Human Exploration and Operations Directorat, said: ‘While Nasa is disappointed that Orbital Sciences' third contracted resupply mission to the International Space Station was not successful today, we will continue to move forward toward the next attempt once we fully understand today's mishap.
‘The crew of the International Space Station is in no danger of running out of food or other critical supplies.
‘Orbital has demonstrated extraordinary capabilities in its first two missions to the station earlier this year, and we know they can replicate that success.
‘Launching rockets is an incredibly difficult undertaking, and we learn from each success and each setback.
‘Today's launch attempt will not deter us from our work to expand our already successful capability to launch cargo from American shores to the International Space Station.’ 

WHERE WAS THE ROCKET GOING?

Antares was due to launch an unmanned Orbital-3 Cygnus spacecraft to deliver more than 5,000lbs of supplies to the International Space Station - including science experiments, experiment hardware, spare parts, and crew provisions - as part of a $1.9billion deal with Nasa.
Outfitted with a new, more powerful upper-stage engine, the Antares rocket was packed with 5,055 pounds (2,293 kg) of supplies, science experiments and equipment, a 15 percent increase over previous missions.

Fire engulfed the pad, which it appears has sustained major damage - although Nasa says there were no casualties from the launchFire engulfed the launchpad, which it appears has sustained major damage - although Nasa says there were no casualties from the launch. It may be a year before Orbital Sciences can fly their rockets again


The rocket exploded six seconds after lift-off from the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport on Wallops Island in Virginia
One of the payloads was the Arkyd 3 satellite (shown) built by Planetary Resources, a company that intends to begin mining asteroids in Earth orbit in the coming decades
A company called Planet Labs had 26 miniature Cubesat satellites on board called Doves. Some of these have already been used for experiments in Earth orbit (shown)
One of the payloads was the Arkyd 3 satellite (shown left) built by Planetary Resources, a company that intends to begin mining asteroids in Earth orbit in the coming decades. A company called Planet Labs, meanwhile, had 26 miniature Cubesat satellites on board called Doves. Some of these have already been used for experiments in Earth orbit (shown right)
Elon Musk, the CEO of rival launch company SpaceX, also expressed his regret at the launch failure, saying: ‘Sorry to hear about the @OrbitalSciences launch. Hope they recover soon.’
In a statement Orbital Sciences Corporation said they had formed an anomaly investigation board that would work with government agencies to determine the cause of the explosion.
‘It is far too early to know the details of what happened,’ said Mr. Frank Culbertson, Orbital’s Executive Vice President and General Manager of its Advanced Programs Group.
‘As we begin to gather information, our primary concern lies with the ongoing safety and security of those involved in our response and recovery operations.
‘We will conduct a thorough investigation immediately to determine the cause of this failure and what steps can be taken to avoid a repeat of this incident.
‘As soon as we understand the cause we will begin the necessary work to return to flight to support our customers and the nation’s space program.’

The launch appeared to be going perfectly - until the rocket left the ground

The launch appeared to be going perfectly - until the rocket left the ground
At a press briefing following the accident, Nasa said that none of the cargo on the rocket was critical to the space station.
The spacecraft was carrying the unmanned Cygnus capsule, a resupply vehicle used to take equipment to the ISS.
Residents near the launch site have also been warned not to touch debris as it could be hazardous.

Mr Culberston warned locals from collecting ‘souvenirs’ from the launch site.
And in a statement Nasa added: 'Damage related to the Oct. 28 launch attempt of an Antares rocket was contained to the hazard area, but there may have been a scattering of debris. Public safety is our No. 1 priority.' 
The rocket was also carrying some classified cryptographic equipment, and immediately following the explosion engineers were told to secure the equipment on the launch site. 
After the launch an unidentified official said the cargo contained ‘class-5 crypto’, although what this was exactly is unknown.
Just hours later a Russian supply ship called Progress lifted off from Kazakhstan at 3:09am EDT this morning (07:09am GMT) from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan.
This had with it nearly 5,200 pounds of food, fuel and supplies for the crew on the ISS.
Meanwhile the next SpaceX spacecraft, called CRS-5, is scheduled to launch to the station in early December.
Conditions for the launch were perfect - but as it left the launchpad, the rocket appeared to explode.
Orbital Sciences stock fell 12.7 percent after hours on news of the explosion, down $3.87 per share at $26.50. 
The spacecraft was carrying 'some classified cryptographic equipment, so we do need to maintain the area around the debris in a secure manner,' said Mike Pinkston, the company's Antares program manager.
'Before launch the Orbital team was not tracking any issues.
Mike Suffredini, Nasa's ISS programme manager, said 'We keep enough on board to keep going for 4-6 months. 
'From a consumables standpoint, we are in good shape - and tomorrow morning a Russian cargo vehicle will launch to ISS. 
'The crew were disappointed, but they are continuing on with their tasks.'  
'SpaceX also has a flight on December 9th. we lost some spares we'll have to replace - but the station is in great shape.'
However, Suffredini admitted the space agency would now juggle the items being taken by SpaceX.
Bill Wrobel of Nasa said 'Preliminary reports show damage was contained to the south of Wallops Island. 
'There is a possiblity of debris washing up on beaches in the area.'
The space agency aid it was letting the fires of rocket propellant in the area burn themselves out.
'No injuries have been reported, and Orbital reports that all personnel around the Wallops Flight Facility launch site have been accounted for.'
The launch director confirmed that all personnel we accounted for, meaning there were no injuries.

Antares was due to launch an unmanned Orbital-3 Cygnus spacecraft to deliver more than 5,000lbs of supplies to the International Space Station - including science experiments, experiment hardware, spare parts, and crew provisions - as part of a $1.9billion deal with Nasa.
Cygnus was to loiter in orbit until 2 November, then fly itself to the station so astronauts can use a robotic crane to snare the capsule and attach it to a berthing port.
The station, a $100 billion research laboratory owned and operated by 15 nations, flies about 260 miles (418 km) above Earth.
Operators were forced to abandon the first attempt at a launch the day before, despite perfect weather conditions, because a boat appeared in a 'hazard area' nearby.
This map shows the maximum elevation that Orbital's Antares rocket would have reached during its first-stage engine burnThis map shows the maximum elevation that Orbital's Antares rocket would have reached during its first-stage engine burn