One of the
payloads was the Arkyd 3 satellite built by Planetary Resources, a
company that intends to begin mining asteroids in Earth orbit in the
coming decades.
This
satellite, costing hundreds of thousands of dollars, was to be a
demonstrator of the technology that will ultimately be used to find
asteroids that are suitable to mine.
But its loss will be a major setback in Planetary Resources’ attempts to begin the age of asteroid mining.
They were publicly upbeat on their Twitter page however, tweeting: ‘Live to fly another day. Onward! #Antares.’
And their chief Chris Lewicki later tweeted: ‘Cheer up everybody - A3 was just a robot! We are making more.’
Arkyd 3 would have been taken to the ISS and then released from an airlock on the Japanese Kibo module.
It
would have tested the control system and also the propulsion system for
the probes that will ultimately be used to find asteroids in the
future.
Another payload lost was a group of 26 small cubesat satellites known as Doves, made by Planet Labs.
These would have been used to observe Earth, taking pictures of the ground, as has been performed by similar Dove satellites.
However,
the company too was upbeat, highlighting that they spread their
spacecraft across many different launches to mitigate the effects of a
disaster such as this.
The beauty of this approach is the very fact that this event is not catastrophic to our company,’ the company writes on their website.
‘Our eggs were not all in one basket.’
In videos, the rocket is seen leaning to the right on purpose after launch to avoid pad equipment.
It
has been reported that officials did send a self-destruct signal to the
rocket, which is standard procedure in such an abort, but it’s unknown
how much of the explosion was due to the initial malfunction or the
self-destruct.
The explosion will also have caused a lot of damage to ground systems and the launchpad used by Orbital to reach space.
This
is the only launchpad that can be used by Orbital’s Antares rocket,
meaning it could take more than a year until they can begin flying
again.
There has been speculation that the cause of the explosion may have been an engine called the AJ-26 used by Orbital.
This
is an old Russian engine once used on their ill-fated lunar rocket, the
N1, that had been upgraded for use on the Antares rocket. Back in May
of this year one of the engines exploded in a test firing.
Officials
finished their first assessment of the island on Wednesday and found
that the damage was mostly centered on the third of the Wallops Island
in the immediate vicinity of the launch pad. However, it will take
months to complete the investigation into what went wrong and the
consequences of the explosion
'I
want to praise the launch team, range safety, all of our emergency
responders and those who provided mutual aid and support on a
highly-professional response that ensured the safety of our most
important resource -- our people,' said Bill Wrobel, Wallops director.
'In
the coming days and weeks ahead, we'll continue to assess the damage on
the island and begin the process of moving forward to restore our space
launch capabilities. There's no doubt in my mind that we will rebound
stronger than ever.'
Investigations
found that many of the buildings surrounding the launchpad had broken
windows and imploded doors. However, sampels showed there were no
hazardous substances detected in the air or in the waters surrounding
the island. Officials will continue to monitor the situation, but the
north side of the island has been reopened for the U.S. Navy to return
to work.
Fears that
the latest explosion would leave the astronauts on the ISS devoid of
essential supplies were unfounded, though, as a Russian rocket launched
perfectly just hours later from Kazakhstan.
But
the explosion of the Antares rocket in Virginia is a major setback for
Orbital Sciences, which is one of several companies competing for launch
contracts from Nasa and elsewhere.
'A mishap has occurred. We have lost the vehicle,' controllers said seconds after blast off.
The
rocket had been delayed from launching for a day after a sailboat
strayed into the hazard zone on Monday, causing that launch to be
scrubbed.
And conditions seemed to be perfect for the latest launch attempt, until seconds after it left the pad when it exploded.
'This is a
tough evening,' said Frank Culberston of Orbital Sciences, which is
working with the FAA to investigate the explosion.
'We want to express our disappointment, especially to the researchers who had science on board.’
Meanwhile
William Gerstenmaier, Associate Administrator of Nasa’s Human
Exploration and Operations Directorat, said: ‘While Nasa is disappointed
that Orbital Sciences' third contracted resupply mission to the
International Space Station was not successful today, we will continue
to move forward toward the next attempt once we fully understand today's
mishap.
‘The crew of the International Space Station is in no danger of running out of food or other critical supplies.
‘Orbital
has demonstrated extraordinary capabilities in its first two missions
to the station earlier this year, and we know they can replicate that
success.
‘Launching rockets is an incredibly difficult undertaking, and we learn from each success and each setback.
‘Today's
launch attempt will not deter us from our work to expand our already
successful capability to launch cargo from American shores to the
International Space Station.’
WHERE WAS THE ROCKET GOING?
Antares
was due to launch an unmanned Orbital-3 Cygnus spacecraft to deliver
more than 5,000lbs of supplies to the International Space Station -
including science experiments, experiment hardware, spare parts, and
crew provisions - as part of a $1.9billion deal with Nasa.
Outfitted
with a new, more powerful upper-stage engine, the Antares rocket was
packed with 5,055 pounds (2,293 kg) of supplies, science experiments and
equipment, a 15 percent increase over previous missions.
Fire engulfed the launchpad, which it appears has sustained major damage -
although Nasa says there were no casualties from the launch. It may be a
year before Orbital Sciences can fly their rockets again
The rocket exploded six seconds after lift-off from the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport on Wallops Island in Virginia
+14
+14
One of the
payloads was the Arkyd 3 satellite (shown left) built by Planetary
Resources, a company that intends to begin mining asteroids in Earth
orbit in the coming decades. A company called Planet Labs, meanwhile,
had 26 miniature Cubesat satellites on board called Doves. Some of these
have already been used for experiments in Earth orbit (shown right)
Elon
Musk, the CEO of rival launch company SpaceX, also expressed his regret
at the launch failure, saying: ‘Sorry to hear about the
@OrbitalSciences launch. Hope they recover soon.’
In
a statement Orbital Sciences Corporation said they had formed an
anomaly investigation board that would work with government agencies to
determine the cause of the explosion.
‘It
is far too early to know the details of what happened,’ said Mr. Frank
Culbertson, Orbital’s Executive Vice President and General Manager of
its Advanced Programs Group.
‘As
we begin to gather information, our primary concern lies with the
ongoing safety and security of those involved in our response and
recovery operations.
‘We
will conduct a thorough investigation immediately to determine the
cause of this failure and what steps can be taken to avoid a repeat of
this incident.
‘As
soon as we understand the cause we will begin the necessary work to
return to flight to support our customers and the nation’s space
program.’
The launch appeared to be going perfectly - until the rocket left the ground
At a press briefing following the accident, Nasa said that none of the cargo on the rocket was critical to the space station.
The spacecraft was carrying the unmanned Cygnus capsule, a resupply vehicle used to take equipment to the ISS.
Residents near the launch site have also been warned not to touch debris as it could be hazardous.
Mr Culberston warned locals from collecting ‘souvenirs’ from the launch site.
And
in a statement Nasa added: 'Damage related to the Oct. 28 launch
attempt of an Antares rocket was contained to the hazard area, but there
may have been a scattering of debris. Public safety is our No. 1
priority.'
The
rocket was also carrying some classified cryptographic equipment, and
immediately following the explosion engineers were told to secure the
equipment on the launch site.
After the launch an unidentified official said the cargo contained ‘class-5 crypto’, although what this was exactly is unknown.
Just hours
later a Russian supply ship called Progress lifted off from Kazakhstan
at 3:09am EDT this morning (07:09am GMT) from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in
Kazakhstan.
This had with it nearly 5,200 pounds of food, fuel and supplies for the crew on the ISS.
Meanwhile the next SpaceX spacecraft, called CRS-5, is scheduled to launch to the station in early December.
Orbital Sciences stock fell 12.7 percent after hours on news of the explosion, down $3.87 per share at $26.50.
The
spacecraft was carrying 'some classified cryptographic equipment, so we
do need to maintain the area around the debris in a secure manner,'
said Mike Pinkston, the company's Antares program manager.
'Before launch the Orbital team was not tracking any issues.
Mike Suffredini, Nasa's ISS programme manager, said 'We keep enough on board to keep going for 4-6 months.
'From a consumables standpoint, we are in good shape - and tomorrow morning a Russian cargo vehicle will launch to ISS.
'The crew were disappointed, but they are continuing on with their tasks.'
'SpaceX also has a flight on December 9th. we lost some spares we'll have to replace - but the station is in great shape.'
However, Suffredini admitted the space agency would now juggle the items being taken by SpaceX.
Bill Wrobel of Nasa said 'Preliminary reports show damage was contained to the south of Wallops Island.
'There is a possiblity of debris washing up on beaches in the area.'
The space agency aid it was letting the fires of rocket propellant in the area burn themselves out.
'No
injuries have been reported, and Orbital reports that all personnel
around the Wallops Flight Facility launch site have been accounted for.'
The launch director confirmed that all personnel we accounted for, meaning there were no injuries.
Antares was
due to launch an unmanned Orbital-3 Cygnus spacecraft to deliver more
than 5,000lbs of supplies to the International Space Station - including
science experiments, experiment hardware, spare parts, and crew
provisions - as part of a $1.9billion deal with Nasa.
Cygnus
was to loiter in orbit until 2 November, then fly itself to the station
so astronauts can use a robotic crane to snare the capsule and attach
it to a berthing port.
The station, a $100 billion research laboratory owned and operated by 15 nations, flies about 260 miles (418 km) above Earth.
Operators
were forced to abandon the first attempt at a launch the day before,
despite perfect weather conditions, because a boat appeared in a 'hazard
area' nearby.
This map shows the maximum elevation that Orbital's Antares rocket would have reached during its first-stage engine burn
No comments:
Post a Comment